<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Below the Belt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chaps.org.uk/below-the-belt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chaps.org.uk/below-the-belt/</link>
	<description>A bisexual perspective on HIV &#38; health promotion work in the UK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 23:00:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lovingboth</title>
		<link>http://chaps.org.uk/below-the-belt/comment-page-1/#comment-16267</link>
		<dc:creator>lovingboth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chaps.org.uk/?p=5#comment-16267</guid>
		<description>Now in its third edition (Jan 2007) - I&#039;ll admit to not noticing any obvious differences.

The comments above are still valid, as there&#039;s still nothing about sex with women in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now in its third edition (Jan 2007) &#8211; I'll admit to not noticing any obvious differences.</p>
<p>The comments above are still valid, as there's still nothing about sex with women in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

