<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for CHAPS off-message</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chaps.org.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chaps.org.uk</link>
	<description>A bisexual perspective on HIV health promotion work in the UK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:13:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on CHAPS starts as it means to go on? by Mike Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://chaps.org.uk/chaps-starts-as-it-means-to-go-on/comment-page-1/#comment-16280</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chaps.org.uk/?p=2#comment-16280</guid>
		<description>I do not think that CHAPS itself paid &#039;lip-service&#039; to bisexual men, but the lack of awareness and acceptance of bisexual men by society.

If it wasn&#039;t for CHAPS I am sure bisexuals would be missed off altogether. It is hard enough to get Gay men&#039;s issues onto agenda&#039;s outside of big cities, let alone bisexual men and womens issues.

Mike xxx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think that CHAPS itself paid &#8216;lip-service&#8217; to bisexual men, but the lack of awareness and acceptance of bisexual men by society.</p>
<p>If it wasn&#8217;t for CHAPS I am sure bisexuals would be missed off altogether. It is hard enough to get Gay men&#8217;s issues onto agenda&#8217;s outside of big cities, let alone bisexual men and womens issues.</p>
<p>Mike xxx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Bottom Line by lovingboth</title>
		<link>http://chaps.org.uk/the-bottom-line/comment-page-1/#comment-16268</link>
		<dc:creator>lovingboth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chaps.org.uk/?p=6#comment-16268</guid>
		<description>Again, now in its third edition (June 2006). 

Some changes include altering the &#039;doesn&#039;t lubricate itself&#039; quote, to say &quot;Mouths and vaginas lubricate themselves; but arses don&#039;t.&quot; Well, the grammar is better, but...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, now in its third edition (June 2006). </p>
<p>Some changes include altering the &#8216;doesn&#8217;t lubricate itself&#8217; quote, to say &#8220;Mouths and vaginas lubricate themselves; but arses don&#8217;t.&#8221; Well, the grammar is better, but&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Below the Belt by lovingboth</title>
		<link>http://chaps.org.uk/below-the-belt/comment-page-1/#comment-16267</link>
		<dc:creator>lovingboth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chaps.org.uk/?p=5#comment-16267</guid>
		<description>Now in its third edition (Jan 2007) - I&#039;ll admit to not noticing any obvious differences.

The comments above are still valid, as there&#039;s still nothing about sex with women in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now in its third edition (Jan 2007) &#8211; I&#8217;ll admit to not noticing any obvious differences.</p>
<p>The comments above are still valid, as there&#8217;s still nothing about sex with women in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
